Impact of Pakistan Bait-Ul-Mal on the Satisfaction Level of the Beneficiaries
Abstract
This research is an impact-based study. It explores the factors that impact the satisfaction level of the beneficiaries who are receiving funds and are acquiring the different programs and services of Pakistan Baitul Mal, a public treasury. The focus of the study is to analyze the working of the organization through the services they are providing and to evaluate the impact it is creating on the satisfaction of the people in need. This study relies on the primary and secondary data both. The results revealed that a vast majority of people were satisfied by the services being provided by beneficiaries and most of them agrees that these services have positively impacted on their satisfaction level. Briefly, this study has also provided some recommendations through which the scope and working of organization can be enhanced.
Downloads
Article Analytics Summary
References
Abu, T. K. (2014). Disaster Managment in Pakistan . Research Gate .
Adam, H. (2019, April 30). Financial Analysis- Random Sampling . Retrieved from Investopedia : https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/simple-random-sample.asp
ADB. (2005 ). PovertY Line Analysis. Retrieved from Asian Development Bank : https://data.adb.org/dashboard
Anderson, C. (1979). Political Designs and Representation of Interest. In P. Schimitter, Trends towards corporatist Intermediation (pp. 73-145 ). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications .
Bank, W. D. (2005). Developing Nations Analysis . WDR Reports.
Brunsson, N., & Olsen, J. (1997). The Reforming Organization. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget. .
Clarke, V. B. (2008). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 77-101.
Dupuy, F., & Thoenig, J. C. (1985). L’Administration en miettes. Paris: Le Seuil.
GoP. (2002). Labor statistics of Pakistan. Retrieved from Government of Pakistan .
Hamilton, L. C. (1992). Regression with Graphics: A second Course in Applied Statistics. pacific Grove.
Kondra, A., & Hinings, C. (1998). Organizational diversity and change in institutional theory. In Organizational Studies (pp. 743-67). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069801900502
mailman.columbia. (n.d.). Retrieved from Population of Health Methods: https://www.mailman.columbia.edu/research/population-health-methods/content-analysis#:~:text=Content%20analysis%20is%20a%20research,qualitative%20data%20(i.e.%20text).&text=Researchers%20can%20then%20make%20inferences,time%20of%20surrounding%20the%20text.
March, J., & Olsen, J. (1975). The uncertainty of the past: organizational learning under ambiguity. European Journal of Political Research , 174-71.
March, J., & Olsen, J. (1976). Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget..
March, J., & Olsen, J. (1984). The New Institutionalism: organizational factors in political life. American Political Science Review , 734-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1961840
Meyer, J., & Scott, W. (1983). Organizational Environments: Rituals and Rationality. London: Sage .
Mohamed Elfil, A. N. (2017 ). Sampling methods in Clinical Research; an Educational Review. PubMed Central NCBI .
Pakistan, u. D. (2019). ReliefWeb. Retrieved from OCHA services: https://reliefweb.int/report/pakistan/multidimensional-poverty-pakistan
(2005 ). PMDGR. Pakistan Government.
Selltiz, C. (1962). Research methods in social relations . NewYorkRinehart and Wineston.
Selzinick, P. (1948). Foundations of The theory of Organizations . American Sociological Review, 25-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2086752
Selzinick, P. (1949). TVA and Grass Roots . Bercley, CA .
Copyright (c) 2020 Najma Sadiq, Ume Laila, Tahir Mehmood, Tooba Rehan Haqqi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
CSRC Publishing and JAFEE adhere to Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License. The authors, submitting and publishing in the Journal of Accounting and Finance in Emerging Economies published by CSRC Publishing, retain the copyright of their work and give the journal right to publish their work agreeing to the licensing policy under Creative Common Attribution-Non Commercial (NC-BY-NC 4.0) International. Under this license, the published authors let others remix, tweak, and build upon their work non-commercially. Yet all the other authors using the content of CSRC Publishing are required to cite author(s), journal name and publisher in their work. CSRC Publishing and JAFEE follow an Open Access Policy for copyright and licensing.
