International ESL Students’ Experiences and Perceptions of Effective and Constructive Feedback Practises on their Academic Writing in MA Programme.

  • Marukh Shakir Assistant Professor, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Pakistan
  • Mujahid Shah Assistant Professor, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Pakistan
  • Munir Khattak Assistant Professor, Department of English, University of Labella, Pakistan
Keywords: experiences, perceptions,, academic assignments


This paper investigates students’ experiences, perceptions, understanding and interpretation of different types of feedback. For this purpose, qualitative interviews were conducted from ten ESL (not having English as their native language) students regarding different types of feedback that had they received on their academic assignments; the effects and potential of those feedback on their learning and writing, and the factors causing difficulties in their effective use of those feedback. According to the findings, all participants expressed their satisfaction with support in the form of feedback in improving their academic writing but also showed some reservations in effectively exercising them. The findings revealed that the interviewees received feedback in varied modes, however, mostly in written form; from tutors; and after the submission of assignments, and less in oral form; from peers; during the writing processes; and before the submission of assignments. Conclusions are drawn and limitation and suggestions for future research are addressed in the light of the findings.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Analytics Summary


Arksey, H., & Knight, P. (1999).Interviewing for social scientists. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. DOI:

Chanock, K. (2000). Comments on essays: do students understand what tutors write? Teaching in Higher Education, 5(1), 95–105. DOI:

Conrad, S. M. & Goldstein, L. (1999). Student revision after teacher written comments: Text, contexts and individuals. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(2), 147–180. DOI:

David, C. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process.Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 219-233. DOI:

Dochy, F.J., & McDowell, L. (1997).Assessment as a tool for learning.Studies in Educational Evaluati on, 23: 279–298. DOI:

Enginarlar, H. (1993). Student response to teacher feedback in EFL writing.System, 21(2), 193–204. DOI:

Fathman, A. K., &Whalley, E. (1990). Teacher response to student writing: Focus on form versus content. In Kroll (Ed.), Second Language Writing: Research Insights for the Classroom. (pp.178-90). Cambridge: CUP. DOI:

Ferris, D. (1995). Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms.TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 33–53. DOI:

Ferris, D. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision.TESOL Quarterly, 31(2), 315–339. DOI:

Ferris, D. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp.81-104). New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI:

Ferris, D. &Hedgcock, J. (2005).Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process, and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Ferris, D., Pezone, S., Tade, C., &Tinti, S. (1997). Teacher commentary on student writing: Descriptions and implications. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6(2), 155– 182. DOI:

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (1993).How to design and evaluate research in education. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill HE.

Gibbs, G. & Simpson, C. (2004).Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning.Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 3–31.

Gibbs, G., Simpson, C. & Macdonald, R. (2003).Improving student learning through changing assessment-a conceptual and practical framework. Paper presented to EARLI conference. Padova.

Goldstein, L. (2001). For Kyla: What does the research say about responding to ESL writers. In T. Silva & P. Matsuda, (Eds.), On second language writing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 73–90.

Goldstein, L. (2006). Feedback and revision in second language writing: Contextual, teacher, and student variables. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 185-205). New York: Cambridge. DOI:

Goldstein, L. & Conrad, S. (1990). Student input and negotiation of meaning in ESL writing conferences. TESOL Quarterly, 24(3), 443–460. DOI:

Hedgcock, J. &Lefkowitz, N. (1994). Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(2), 141–163. DOI:

Hedgcock, J. &Lefkowitz, N. (1996). Some input on input:Two analyses of student response to expert feedback in L2 writing. The Modern Language Journal, 80(3), 287–308. DOI:

Hester, V. (2001).Responding to student writing: locating our theory-practice mong communities. Paper presented at the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication. Denver.

Hounsell, D. (1987). Essay writing and the quality of feedback.In J.T.E. Richardson, M. Eysenck, & D.W. Piper Milton Keynes (Eds.), Student learning research in education and cognitive psychology. Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press.

Hounsell, D. (2003). Student feedback, learning and development.In M. Slowey& D. Watson (Eds.), Higher education and the lifecourse. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Higgins, R. (2000) ‘Be more critical’: rethinking assessment feedback, paper presented to British Educational Research Association Conference, Cardiff University, 7–10 September. Retrieved on May 20 from:

Higgins, R., Hartley, P. & Skelton, A. (2001).Getting the message across: the problem of communicating assessment feedback.Teaching in Higher Education, 6(2), 269–274. DOI:

Hyland, F. (1998).The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers.Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(3), 255–286. DOI:

Hyland, F. (2000). ESL writers and Feedback: Giving more autonomy to students. Language Teaching Research, 4(1), 33–54. DOI:

Hyland, F. (2001). Providing effective support: investigating feedback to distance language learners. Open Learning, 16(3), 233–247. DOI:

Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman.

Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2001).Sugaring the pill: praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 185–212. DOI:

Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (2006).Feedback on second language students' writing.Language Teaching, 39, 83-101. DOI:

Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (Eds.) (2006).Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI:

James, D. (2000). Making the graduate: perspectives on student experience of assessment in higher education. In A. Filer (Ed.), Assessment: social practice and social product. London: RoutledgeFalmer

Lea, M.R., &Steirer, B. W. (2000). Student writing and staff feedback in higher education: an academic literacy approach. In M. Lea and B. Steirer (Eds.), Students’ writing in higher education: new contexts. Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press.

Leki, I. (1991). The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college level writing classes. Foreign Language Annals 24(3), 203–218. DOI:

Leki, I. (2006). "You cannot ignore": L2 graduate students' experience of and responses to written feedback practices within their disciplines. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 266-285). New York: CUP. DOI:

Lizzio, A., &Keithia, W. (2008). Feedback on assessment: students’ perceptions of quality and effectiveness. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 263–275. DOI:

Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., Gilchrist, J., &Gallois, C. (2003).The role of gender in the construction and evaluation of feedback effectiveness.Management Communication Quarterly, 16, 341–379. DOI:

Master, P. (1995). Consciousness Raising and Article Pedagogy. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic Writing in a Second Language: Essays in Research and Pedagogy (pp. 183-205). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Norton, L.S., & Norton, J. C. W. (2001).Essay feedback: how can it help students improve their academic writing? Paper presented at First International Conference of the European Association for the Teaching of Academic Writing across Europe (EATAW). Gronigen.

Orsmond, P., Merry, S. &Reiling, K. (2005). Biology students’ utilization of tutors’ formative feedback: a qualitative interview study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 369-386 DOI:

Patthey-Chavez, G., & Ferris, D. (1997).Writing conferences and the weaving of multi-voiced texts in college composition.Research in the Teaching of English, 31(1), 51–90.

Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed). London: Routledge Falmer. DOI:

Robb, T., Ross, S. &Shortreed, I. (1986).Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality.TESOL Quarterly, 20(1), 83–93. DOI:

Rubin, H., & Rubin, I. (1995).Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Saito, H. (1994). Teachers’ practices and students’ preferences for feedback on second language writing: A case study of adult ESL learners. TESL Canada Journal, 11(2), 46–70. DOI:

Vygotsky, L. (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.

Williams, J. (2004). Tutoring and revision: Second language writers in the writing center. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(3), 173–201. DOI:

Young, P. (2000). I might as well give up: self-esteem and mature students feelings about feedback on assignments. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 24, 409–418. DOI:

Zamel, V. (1985).Responding to student writing.TESOL Quarterly, 19(1), 79–101. DOI:

Zhu, W. (2004). Faculty views on the importance of writing, the nature of academic writing, and teaching and responding to writing in the disciplines. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13 , 29–48. DOI:

How to Cite
Marukh Shakir, Mujahid Shah, & Munir Khattak. (2020). International ESL Students’ Experiences and Perceptions of Effective and Constructive Feedback Practises on their Academic Writing in MA Programme. Journal of Business and Social Review in Emerging Economies, 6(4), 1401-1413.