Role of Love and Affection in Mate Selection among Educated Women in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
Purpose: The concern study “role of love and affection in mate selection” among educated females was conducted in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.
Methodology: A sample size of 278 randomly selected educated females working in three public sector universities of Khyber Pakhtukhwa were selected by a pre-tested questionnaire.
Findings: Results report love and affection as main consideration of females in mate selection. The major role in this respect was played by the female education, their exposure to mass media and less effective role of religion. Females found believing that a marriage cannot exist without love and affection between husband and wife. It resulted a rise in trend towards love marriages despite of their low success rate mainly due to over expectations and perceiving it a western idea. Females also believing that there is more equity and independence in love marriages.
Implications: The concept of humility should be inculcated among young girls during socialization so as they can chose a match that encourages Islamic and cultural teachings about simplicity and humbleness instead of being attracted towards worldly goods and unrealistic needs that are supported by western images.
Bachand, L. L., & Caron, S. L. (2001). Ties that bind: A qualitative study of happy long-term marriages. Contemporary Family Therapy, 23(1), 105-121.
Banerjee, A., Duflo, E., Ghatak, M., & Lafortune, J. (2013). Marry for what? Caste and mate selection in modern India. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 5(2), 33-72.
Bee, H. L. (1994). Lifespan development. HarperCollins College Publishers.
Broude, G. J. (1994). Marriage, family, and relationships: a cross-cultural encyclopedia. Abc- Clio Inc.
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological review, 100(2), 204.
Chaudhry, S. (2004). The investigation into attitude of rural women towards exchange marriages: A case study in District Jhang (Doctoral dissertation, M. Sc. Thesis Rural Sociology, Univ. of Agric., Faisalabad).
Day, R. A. (2001). Assessment of the level of romanticism, beliefs in marital myths, and view of marriage in never married college students (Master's thesis, Lamar University.).
Dyrenforth, P. S., Kashy, D. A., Donnellan, M. B., & Lucas, R. E. (2010). Predicting relationship and life satisfaction from personality in nationally representative samples from three countries: the relative importance of actor, partner, and similarity effects. Journal of personality and social psychology, 99(4), 690.
Fatima.M & M. Asir Ajmal (2011). Happy marriage: International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Vol. 1 No. 21.
Frank, N. and Gill M (2002). International Encyclopedia of Sociology volume one, 1–780 (761).
British Library cataloguing-in-publishing data consulting editor: Hector L. Delgada.
Gonzaga, G. C., Campos, B., & Bradbury, T. (2007). Similarity, convergence, and relationship satisfaction in dating and married couples. Journal of personality and social psychology, 93(1), 34.
Grossbard-Shechtman, S., & Fu, X. (2002). Women's Labor Force Participation and Status Exchange in Intermarriage: A Model and Evidence for Hawaii1. Journal of Bioeconomics, 4(3), 241-268.
Gulzar, A. & Husain, W. (2015). The psychosocial preferences in mate selection among Pakistanis. FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 9(1), 29.
Islam, S.(1992).A Sociological Study of Factors Effecting the Marital Adjustment of Couples in
Selected Community of Faisalabad District. M.Sc. Un-published Thesis, Faisalabad (Pakistan): University of Agriculture, Department of Rural Sociology.
Kalmijn, M., & Flap, H. (2001). Assortative meeting and mating: Unintended consequences of organized settings for partner choices. Social forces, 79(4), 1289-1312.
Kline, S. L., Zhang, S., Manohar, U., Ryu, S., Suzuki, T., & Mustafa, H. (2012). The role of communication and cultural concepts in expectations about marriage: Comparisons between young adults from six countries. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36(3), 319-330.
Levine, R., Sato, S., Hashimoto, T., & Verma, J. (2004). Love and marriage in eleven cultures. Close relationships: Key readings, 277.
Lippa, R. A. (2007). The preferred traits of mates in a cross-national study of heterosexual and homosexual men and women: An examination of biological and cultural influences. Archives of sexual behavior, 36(2), 193-208.
Luo, S., & Klohnen, E. C. (2005). Assortative mating and marital quality in newlyweds: a couple-centered approach. Journal of personality and social psychology, 88(2), 304.
Maliki, A. E. (2009). Determinants of Mate selection choice among University Students in South-South Zone of Nigeria. Edo Journal of Counselling, 2(2), 165-174.
Marriage and Family Encyclopedia. (2012). Growth of interracial marriage. Retrieved February 15, 2012 from http://family.jrank.org/pages/929/Interracial-Marriage-Growth-Interracial- Marriage.html mate choice in personality traits: Homogamy and sexual imprinting. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 467–472.
Murray, C. I., & Kimura, N. (2003). Multiplicity of paths to couple formation in Japan. Mate selection across cultures, 247-68.
O’Leary, R. (2001). Modernization and religious intermarriage in the Republic of Ireland. British Journal of Sociology, 52(4), 647–665.
Priest, J., Burnett, M., Thompson, R., Vogel, A., & Schvaneveldt, P. L. (2009). Relationship dissolution and romance and mate selection myths. Family Science Review, 14, 48-57.
Puri, D. (1999). Gift of a daughter, change and continuity in marriage patterns among two generations of North Indians in Toronto and Delhi (Doctoral dissertation, National Library of Canada= Bibliothèque nationale du Canada).
Rehman, S.Y. (2002). Sociology the Basic Concepts. Faisalabad (Pakistan) Allied Publishers.
Sekaran, U. (2003). Research Methods for Business. USA, Hermitage Publishing Service.
Sillars, A. L., & Vangelisti, A. L. (2006). Communication: Basic properties and their relevance to relationship research. The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships, 331-351.
Sharp, E. A., & Ganong, L. H. (2000). Raising awareness about marital expectations: Are unrealistic beliefs changed by integrative teaching?. Family Relations, 49(1), 71-76.
Skolnick, A. (2005). Marriages (Selecting a Partner), Online Encyclopedia, University of
California at Berkeley and Visiting Professor of Sociology, New York University.
Sprecher, S., & Regan, P. C. (2002). Liking some things (in some people) more than others: Partner preferences in romantic relationships and friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19(4), 463-481.
Stivens, M. (2000). Becoming modern in Malaysia: Women at the end of the Twentieth century. In L. Edwards, & M. Roces (Eds.), Women in Asia: Tradition, modernity and globalization (pp. 16–38). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2002). Table MS-3. Interracial Married Couples: 1980–2002. Retrieved September 29, 2008 from http://www.census.gov/population/socdemo/hh- fam/tabMS-3.pdf
Yılmaz, M., Güngör, H. C., & Çelik, S. B. (2013). Investigation Romance and Mate Selection Myths of University Students.
Yılmazçoban, M. (2010). Evlilikte Çiftleri Etkileyen Unsurlar ve Arkadaşlık İlkeleri. Yalova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 1(1).
Yon, D. A. (2000). Elusive Culture: Schooling, Race, and Identity in Global Times. SUNY Series, Identities in the Classroom. State University of New York Press, c/o Cup Services, PO Box 6525, Ithaca, NY 14851.York: Routledge.
Yum, Y., & Canary, D. J. (2003). Maintaining relationships in Korea and the United States: Features of Korean culture that affect relational maintenance beliefs and behaviors. Maintaining relationships through communication, 277-296.
Zhang, S., & Kline, S. L. (2009). Can I make my own decision? A cross-cultural study of perceived social network influence in mate selection. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40(1), 3-23.
CSRC Publishing and JBSEE adhere to Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License. The authors submitting and publishing in JBSEE agree to the copyright policy under creative common license 4.0 (Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International). Under this license, the authors published in JBSEE retain the copyright including publishing rights of their scholarly work and agree to let others remix, tweak, and build upon their work non-commercially. All other authors using the content of SBSEE are required to cite author(s) and publisher in their work. CSRC Publishing and JBSEE follow an Open Access Policy for copyright and licensing.