Balancing Creativity and Efficiency in Business Process Redesign: A Comparative Study of Explorative and Exploitative Techniques
Abstract
Purpose: The research paper under consideration analyzes the relative effect of exploitative and explorative methods on business process redesign (BPR) results in terms of quantity of ideas, variety of ideas, suitability of idea, and effectiveness of idea. It aims at identifying how various redesign strategies strike the balance between creativity and operational efficiency in the organizations.
Design/Methodology/Approach: A quantitative experimental study was adopted that involved 150 respondents, i.e. graduate students and BPM professionals assigned randomly to exploitative (Best Practices of Process Redesign) and explorative (Business Process Design Space) techniques groups. The participants were allowed to come up with redesign ideas of a standardized business process scenario, which were evaluated using the quantity, novelty, appropriateness, and impact.
Findings: The results have shown that explorative techniques greatly produced a high number and variety of redesign ideas, which increased creativity and breadth of ideation, but exploitative techniques generated a slightly higher number of more appropriate ideas, but the disparity was not significant. There were no notable differences in the impactfulness of ideas of techniques. These results prove that explorative strategies can improve creative work, whereas exploitative strategies facilitate operational congruency.
Implications/Originality/Value: This paper indicates the usefulness of an ambidextrous approach to BPR by suggesting that organizations should adopt an explorative and exploitative approach together in a strategic manner to realize the redesign results which are not only innovative but also implementable in a real organizational setting.
Downloads
Article Analytics Summary
References
Attaran, M. (2003). Information technology and business-process redesign. Business Process Management Journal, 9(4), 440–458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150310484508
Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238–256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/30040711
Beverungen, D., Mendling, J., & Wetzstein, B. (2020). Guidelines for business process modeling. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 62(3), 193–213.
Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., Mendling, J., & Reijers, H. A. (2018). Fundamentals of Business Process Management (2nd ed.). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56509-4
Grisold, T., Mendling, J., & vom Brocke, J. (2019). Exploring the role of process mining in business process redesign: A research agenda. Business Process Management Journal, 25(3), 393–414.
Groß, S., Grisold, T., Mendling, J., & Haase, J. (2024). Idea generation in exploitative and explorative business process redesign techniques. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 22, 527–555. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-024-00684-0
Gross, S., Malinova, M., & Mendling, J. (2019). Navigating process design space: Toward a new conceptualization of business process redesign. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 61(1), 47–63.
Groß, S., Mendling, J., & vom Brocke, J. (2019). Structuring redesign techniques: A classification approach for business process redesign. Business Process Management Journal, 25(6), 1284–1310.
Kettinger, W. J., Teng, J. T. C., & Guha, S. (1997). Business process change: A study of methodologies, techniques, and tools. MIS Quarterly, 21(1), 55–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249742
Lavie, D., Stettner, U., & Tushman, M. L. (2010). Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 109–155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/19416521003691287
Malhotra, Y. (1998). Business process redesign: An overview. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 26(3), 27–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110949155.26
Malinova, M., Bork, D., & Mendling, J. (2022). Exploring creativity in business process design: A theoretical framework and research agenda. Information Systems, 106, 101925.
Malinova, M., Leopold, H., Mendling, J., & vom Brocke, J. (2022). A theory of business process redesign. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 64(6), 649–668.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
Mendling, J., Pentland, B. T., & Recker, J. (2020). Building a complementary agenda for business process management and digital innovation. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(3), 208–219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1755207
O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324–338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0025
Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34(3), 375–409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316058
Recker, J., Indulska, M., Green, P., & Rosemann, M. (2012). The state of the art of business process modeling: What we know and what we don’t. Business Process Management Journal, 18(2), 230–262.
Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/41165852
Copyright (c) 2025 Taiwo A. Muritala
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
CSRC Publishing and JBSEE adhere to Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License. The authors submitting and publishing in JBSEE agree to the copyright policy under creative common license 4.0 (Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International). Under this license, the authors published in JBSEE retain the copyright including publishing rights of their scholarly work and agree to let others remix, tweak, and build upon their work non-commercially. All other authors using the content of SBSEE are required to cite author(s) and publisher in their work. CSRC Publishing and JBSEE follow an Open Access Policy for copyright and licensing.
