Collaborative Learning via Sharing Session towards Achieving Training Effectiveness in Negotiation Education

  • Shahrizal Badlishah PhD Scholar, School of Business Management, College of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia
  • Abdul Halim Abdul Majid Associate Professor, School of Business Management, College of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia
Keywords: Collaborative Learning, Training Effectiveness, Negotiation Education


Attaining training effectiveness for Negotiation as an elective subject in obtaining Bachelor of Human Resource Management in University Utara Malaysia will be beneficial for students when they start to work. The subject requires strong fundamental knowledge in human resource management and other management related subjects, as it demands students to be able to relate issues and needs in business venture strategic decision. However, the drawback in achieving this is difficult because students are weak in the basics due to low clasp of fundamental understanding. This action research has been conducted in two consecutive semesters in order to find the best way to improve student basic understanding thus connection to the higher-level knowledge is possible. Collaborative teaching, which was introduced as a sharing session, through small group discussion has been chosen for the purpose of developing effective negotiation education. As a result, students are more comfortable to be open-minded and less stressful while learning with their peers compares to instructors. Based on interviews and observations, results found that collaborative learning do improve understanding and built critical thinking. The approach developed had resulted a more relax and conducive learning environment and the training effectiveness achieved served as evidence in students' performance.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Analytics Summary


Ahmad, A., Johnson, C., &Storer, T. (2015).A Cyber Exercise Post Assessment: Adoption of the Kirkpatrick Model. Advances in Information Sciences and Service Sciences,7(2), 1.

Alliger, G. M. and Janak, E. A. (1989), ‘Kirkpatrick’s levels of training criteria’, Personnel Psychology, 42, 331–42. DOI:

Anderson, A. H., Newlands, A., Mullin, J., Fleming, A. M., Doherty-Sneddon, G., & Van der Velden, J. (1996). Impact of video-mediated communication on simulated service encounters. Interacting With Computers, 8, 193-206. DOI:

Barry, B., Lewicki, R., & Saunders, D. (2015). Essentials of Negotiation. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

Buch, K., & Bartley, S. (2002). Learning style and training delivery mode preference. Journal of Workplace Learning, 14, 5-10 DOI:

Dalessio, A. (1998), “Using multi‐source feedback for employee development and personnel decisions”, in Smither, J.W. (Ed.), Performance Appraisal: State‐of‐the‐art in Practice, Jossey‐Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp. 278‐330.

Dewhurst, D., Harris, M., Foster-Bohm, G., & Odell, G. (2015). Applying The Kirkpatrick Model To A Coaching Program. Training & Development, 42(1), 14.

Doherty-Sneddon, G., Anderson, A., O’Malley, C., Langton, S., Garrod, S., & Bruce, V. (1997). Face-to-face interaction and video-mediated communication: A comparison of dialogue structure and task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3, 105-125. DOI:

Dooly, M. (2008). Telecollaborative language learning: A guidebook to moderating intercultural collaboration online. Peter Lang.

Goldstein, I. L. (1993). Training in organization: Needs assessment, development and evaluation (3rd ed.). Monterey, CA: Brooks

Gokhale, A. A. (1995). Collaborative Learning Enhances Critical Thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 7 (1995). DOI:

Hale, J. J. (1998). The visual superiority effect: Retention of audio visual messages (Doctoral dissertation). ETD Collection for University of Connecticut (Paper AAI9918072).

Hedge, J.W., Borman, W.C. and Birkeland, S.A. (2001),“History And Development Of Multisource Feedback As A Methodology”, Handbook of Multisource Feedback, Jossey‐Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp. 15‐32.

Latham, G. P., &Saari, L. M. (1979). The application of social learning theory to training supervisors through behavioral modeling. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 239-246. DOI:

Meline, C. W. (1976). Does the medium matter? Journal of Communication, 26, 81-89. DOI:

Raphael, M. A., & Wagner, E. E. (1974). Training via text, audiotape or TV makes a difference: Or does it? Training and Development Journal, 28, 3-5.

Skylar Powell, K., &Yalcin, S. (2010). Managerial training effectiveness: A meta-analysis 1952-2002. Personnel Review, 39(2), 227-241 DOI:

Saks, A. M., & Burke, L. A. (2012). An investigation into the relationship between training evaluation and the transfer of training. International Journal of Training and Development, 16(2), 118-127. DOI:

Slavin, R. E. (1989). Research On Cooperative Learning: An International Perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 33(4), 231-243. DOI:

Totten, S. (1991). Overview of cooperative learning. Cooperative learning: a guide to research. New York: Garland Publishing Inc.

Veinott, E., Olson, J., Olson, G., & Fu, X. (1999). Video helps remote work: Speakers who need to negotiate common-ground benefit from seeing each other. Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 302-309). New York, NY: ACM DOI:

Wagner, E. D. (1998, August). Interaction strategies for online training designs. Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching & Learning, Madison, WI.

Webb, N. M. (1985). Student Interaction And Learning In Small Groups. In learning To Cooperate, Cooperating To Learn (pp. 147-172). Springer US. DOI:

Wexley, K. N., & Latham, G. P. (1991). Developing and training human resources in organization (2nd ed.). New York, NY: HarperCollins

How to Cite
Badlishah, S., & Abdul Majid, A. H. (2015). Collaborative Learning via Sharing Session towards Achieving Training Effectiveness in Negotiation Education. Journal of Business and Social Review in Emerging Economies, 1(2), 61-68.