E-Governance Initiatives and Citizen Participation at Global Perspective: Systematic Literature Review
Abstract
Purpose: This systematic review examines extant literature to understand the relationship between e-governance initiatives and citizen participation.
Design/Methodology/Approach: We conducted a systematic review of 72 articles published in interdisciplinary journals indexed in the Web of Science database between 1900 and 2024. This review examined various forms of e-governance, including digital platforms, official websites, mobile apps, social media, and open data portals
Findings: This review revealed the evolution of e-governance from basic online services to sophisticated digital governance utilizing AI and data science. While e-governance initiatives hold promise for increased citizen participation, transparency, and accountability in policymaking, several factors influence their success, including technological infrastructure, digital literacy, trust in government, and legal frameworks. This study identified gaps in the current knowledge base, particularly regarding the long-term sustainability and impact of these initiatives.
Implications/Originality/Value: These findings highlight the need for interdisciplinary research to better understand and evaluate the effectiveness of citizen-empowering e-governance initiatives. This study provides a structured overview of existing knowledge, pinpoints open research questions, and suggests a unified model for future research in this area.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Alcaide Muñoz, C., Alcaide Muñoz, L., & Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P. (2023). Strategic alignment of open government initiatives in Andalusia. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 89(3), 685–702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523221086125
Aleisa, N. (2024). Key factors influencing the e-government adoption: a systematic literature review. Journal of Innovative Digital Transformation. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIDT-09-2023-0016
Androniceanu, A., & Georgescu, I. (2021). E-Government in European countries, a comparative approach using the Principal Components Analysis. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 14(2), 65–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2021-0015
Androniceanu, A., & Georgescu, I. (2023). Hierarchical Clustering of the European Countries from the Perspective of E-government, E-participation, and Human Development. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 16(2), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2023-0011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2023-0011
Antonucci, M. C., Sorice, M., & Volterrani, A. (2022). Social and digital vulnerabilities: The role of participatory processes in the reconfiguration of urban and digital space. Frontiers in Political Science, 4, 970958. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2022.970958
Afzal, M. A., Munir, S., Abbas, N., & Farooq, A. (2024). A Retrospective of Earnings Management: Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Accounting and Finance in Emerging Economies, 10(2), 253–272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26710/jafee.v10i2.3039
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
Aytac, U. (2024). Digital domination: Social media and contestatory democracy. Political Studies, 72(1), 6–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217221096564
Abbas, N., & Shahid, M. S. (2024). Mapping the Impact of Green Finance on Corporate Sustainability: A Bibliometric Analysis. 4(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32350/aar.41.05
Baccarne, B., Evens, T., & De Marez, L. (2020). Understanding civic crowdfunding as a mechanism for leveraging civic engagement and urban innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 10(5), 51–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1356
Bartoletti, R., & Faccioli, F. (2020). Civic Collaboration and Urban Commons. Citizen’s Voices on a Public Engagement Experience in an Italian City. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 13(2), 1132–1151.
Bayat, A., & Kawalek, P. (2023). Digitization and urban governance: The city as a reflection of its data infrastructure. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 89(1), 21–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523211033205
Briassoulis, H. (2021). Becoming E-Petition: An assemblage-based framework for analysis and research. SAGE Open, 11(1), 21582440211001350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211001354
Brioschi, M., Bonardi, M., Fabrizio, N., Fuggetta, A., Verga, E. S., & Zuccalà, M. (2021). Enabling and Promoting Sustainability through Digital API Ecosystems: An example of successful implementation in the smart city domain. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1412
Dawes, S. S. (2008). The evolution and continuing challenges of e‐governance. Public Administration Review, 68, S86–S102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00981.x
Dunleavy, P., & Margetts, H. (2023). Data science, artificial intelligence and the third wave of digital era governance. Public Policy and Administration, 09520767231198737. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767231198737
Ehiane, S., & Bodilenyane, K. (n.d.). E‑Parliament, Citizen Engagement and Democratic Representation in South Africa: Challenges and Prospects. Editors: Paul K, 143.
Fischli, R., & Muldoon, J. (2024). Empowering Digital Democracy. Perspectives on Politics, 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592724000409
Fulga, T. M., & Profiroiu, M. C. (2019). Do Local Government Websites Meet the Minimum Criteria to Serve their Purpose? Management Research & Practice, 11(2).
Fung, A. (2015). Putting the public back into governance: The challenges of citizen participation and its future. Public Administration Review, 75(4), 513–522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12361
Ghazinoory, S., Mardani, A., Maddah-Ali, M. A., & Montazer, G. A. (2024). A blockchain-powered e-cognocracy model for democratic decision making. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 1–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-023-00663-x
Gianola, G., Wyss, D., Bächtiger, A., & Gerber, M. (2024). Empowering local citizens: assessing the inclusiveness of a digital democratic innovation for co-creating a Voting Advice Application. Local Government Studies, 50(1), 174–203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2023.2185228
Godinho, M. A., Borda, A., Kariotis, T., Molnar, A., Kostkova, P., & Liaw, S.-T. (2021). Knowledge co-creation in participatory policy and practice: Building community through data-driven direct democracy. Big Data & Society, 8(1), 20539517211019430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211019430
Grigalashvili, V. (2022). E-government and E-governance: Various or Multifarious Concepts. International Journal of Scientific and Management Research, 5(01), 183–196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37502/IJSMR.2022.5111
Halachmi, A., & Greiling, D. (2013). Transparency, e-government, and accountability: Some issues and considerations. Public Performance & Management Review, 36(4), 562–584. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576360404
Huang, B., & Yu, J. (2019). Leading digital technologies for coproduction: The case of “Visit Once” administrative service reform in Zhejiang Province, China. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 24, 513–532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-019-09627-w
Idzi, F. M., & Gomes, R. C. (2022). Digital governance: government strategies that impact public services. Global Public Policy and Governance, 2(4), 427–452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-022-00055-w
Jiang, J., Meng, T., & Zhang, Q. (2019). From Internet to social safety net: The policy consequences of online participation in China. Governance, 32(3), 531–546. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12391
Kettl, D. F. (2000). The transformation of governance: Globalization, devolution, and the role of government. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 488–497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00112
Kézai, P. K., & Páthy, Á. (2023). Sister city network’s development in central-eastern European regional centres. Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, 18(3), 5–26.
Kud, A. (2023). Decentralized information platforms in public governance: Reconstruction of the modern democracy or comfort blinding? International Journal of Public Administration, 46(3), 195–221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.1993905
Li, M. (2015). Governance of citizen participation and its related concepts: a review of literature. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 61, 99–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.61.99
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), W-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2427/5768
Manazir, S. H. (2023). Abstruse characteristics of people participation: An analysis of the smart city campaign over mygov platform in India. International Journal of Public Administration, 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2023.2262159
Margetts, H., & Dunleavy, P. (2013). The second wave of digital-era governance: a quasi-paradigm for government on the Web. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 371(1987), 20120382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0382
Martins, J., & Veiga, L. G. (2022). Digital government as a business facilitator. Information Economics and Policy, 60, 100990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2022.100990
Omanga, D. (2021). WhatsApp as ‘digital publics’: the Nakuru Analysts and the evolution of participation in county governance in Kenya. In Publics in Africa in a Digital Age (pp. 173–189). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003152446-11
Pan, J., & Chen, K. (2018). Concealing corruption: How Chinese officials distort upward reporting of online grievances. American Political Science Review, 112(3), 602–620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000205
Perez, O., Bar-Ilan, J., Gazit, T., Aharony, N., Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & Bronstein, J. (2018). The prospects of E-democracy: an experimental study of collaborative E-rulemaking. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 15(3), 278–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2018.1485605 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2018.1485605
Phimolsathien, T. (2022). Guidelines for driving business sector into digital transactions for business survival: a case study of the impact of covid-19 to smes business in thailand. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 26(2), 293–309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2022.26.2.18
Pirannejad, A., & Ingrams, A. (2023). Open government maturity models: A global comparison. Social Science Computer Review, 41(4), 1140–1165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393211063107
Potter, J. (1998). Discursive social psychology: From attitudes to evaluative practices. European Review of Social Psychology, 9(1), 233–266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779843000090
Powell, M., Colin, M., Lee Kleinman, D., Delborne, J., & Anderson, A. (2011). Imagining ordinary citizens? Conceptualized and actual participants for deliberations on emerging technologies. Science as Culture, 20(1), 37–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09505430903567741
Przeybilovicz, E., Cunha, M. A., Geertman, S., Leleux, C., Michels, A., Tomor, Z., Webster, C. W. R., & Meijer, A. (2022). Citizen participation in the smart city: findings from an international comparative study. Local Government Studies, 48(1), 23–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2020.1851204
Rădulescu, C., HUDEA, O. S. C., & PAPUC, R. M. (2018). Analysis of websites belonging to public universities from the perspective of the democratic governance exigencies. A marketing research approach. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 14(54), 90–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24193/tras.54E.6
Riduan, A. (2024). Citizen Participation in Policy Decision-Making. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Approach Sciences and Technologies, 1(2), 65–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62207/fz1xn342
Royo, S., Bellò, B., Torres, L., & Downe, J. (2024). The success of e-participation. Learning lessons from Decide Madrid and We asked, You said, We did in Scotland. Policy and Internet, 16(1), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.363 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.363
Royo, S., Yetano, A., & Acerete, B. (2014). E‐participation and environmental protection: Are local governments really committed? Public Administration Review, 74(1), 87–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12156
Schlozman, K. L., Verba, S., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Participation’s not a paradox: The view from American activists. British Journal of Political Science, 25(1), 1–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400007043
Schmidthuber, L., Hilgers, D., & Rapp, M. (2019). Political innovation, digitalisation and public participation in party politics. Policy & Politics, 47(3), 391–413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/030557319X15579230420054
Sen, A. (1987). Gender and cooperative conflicts.
Sleigh, J., & Vayena, E. (2021). Public engagement with health data governance: the role of visuality. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00826-6
Soares, C. D. M., Joia, L. A., Altieri, D., & Regasso, J. G. L. (2021). What’s up? Mobile instant messaging apps and the truckers′ uprising in Brazil. Technology in Society, 64, 101477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101477
Tan, E., & Rodriguez Müller, A. P. (2023). Paths to citizens-controlled coproduction: The use of blockchain technology in digital coproduction. Public Management Review, 1–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2218388
Thomas, J. C., & Streib, G. (2005). E-democracy, e-commerce, and e-research: Examining the electronic ties between citizens and governments. Administration & Society, 37(3), 259–280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399704273212
Touchton, M., Wampler, B., & Spada, P. (2019). The digital revolution and governance in Brazil: Evidence from participatory budgeting. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 16(2), 154–168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2019.1613281
van Zoonen, L. (2020). Data governance and citizen participation in the digital welfare state. Data & Policy, 2, e10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2020.10
Vlad, T., Hințea, C., Neamțu, B., & Stănică, V. (2023). Impact, Utilization and Applications of Digital Media for Government in Rural Settings. A Comparative US-Romania Research. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 19(70), 128–155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24193/tras.70E.7
Williamson, B. (2014). Knowing public services: Cross-sector intermediaries and algorithmic governance in public sector reform. Public Policy and Administration, 29(4), 292–312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076714529139
Zamani, M., Movahedi, M., & Raykova, M. (2018). Rapidchain: Scaling blockchain via full sharding. Proceedings of the 2018 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 931–948. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3243734.3243853
Zautashvili, D. (2017). E-government maturity model by growth level of e-services delivery. Journal of Technical Science and Technologies, 6(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31578/jtst.v6i2.131
Zou, Y. (2024). Urban resilience, digital technologies, and the economic recovery of a city from the pandemic. Public Administration Review, 84(4), 637–650. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13678
Copyright (c) 2024 Shahid Munir, Saiqa Sadiq, Nasir Abbas, Farah Rasul
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
CSRC Publishing and SBSEE adhere to Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License. The authors submitting and publishing in SBSEE agree to the copyright policy under creative common license 4.0 (Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International). Under this license, the authors published in SBSEE retain the copyright including publishing rights of their scholarly work and agree to let others remix, tweak, and build upon their work non-commercially. All other authors using the content of SBSEE are required to cite author(s) and publisher in their work. CSRC Publishing and JAFEE follow an Open Access Policy for copyright and licensing.
