A Political Discourse Analysis of the Speeches of President Obama and Prime Minister Gillani
Abstract
This paper examines the discourse of the two political speeches made by the Pakistan Premier Syed Yousuf Raza Gilani and the US President Barack Obama after the elimination of Osama Bin Laden on May 3, 2011. The objective of this analysis is to discover and explicate how ideology is established and unveiled by the use of language. For the stated purpose, the framework of this study draws on Halliday’s model of transitivity (Halliday and Matthiessen, 2004) through which we aim to investigate the transitivity choices employed by the individual speakers, the participant roles (Hasan, 1985) assigned to the enemy and the pronoun choices (Butt et. al., 2004) made by the two speakers in order to reveal a particular socio-political stance disseminated through the two speeches in two cultures: of the USA and Pakistan. The findings indicate that linguistic choices in transitivity play a fundamental role in conveying of implicit and dominant ideologies.
Downloads
Article Analytics Summary
References
Atkinson, J. M. (1984). Our masters' voices: The language and body language of
politics. London: Methuen.
Butt, D. G., Lukin, A., & Matthiessen, C. M. (2004). Grammar–The First Covert
Operation of War. Discourse & Society.
Caffarel, A., & Rechniewski, E. (2009). A systemic functional approach to analyzing and interpreting ideology: an illustration from French editorials. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, (22), 27-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14198/raei.2009.22.03
Cameron, D. (2001). Working with spoken discourse. London: SAGE.
Chomsky, N. (1992). Excerpts from Manufacturing Consent Noam Chomsky interviewed by various interviewers. Interview.
Durān, J. (2008). The Analysis of Political Discourse Applied to Bush's and Kerry's Speeches. Systemic Functional Linguistic in Use. 29(1): 267-282.
Erikson, R. S., & Tedin, K. L. (2003). American public opinion: Its origins, content, and impact. New York: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change, London: Polity Press.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. The critical study of language. Language in social life series. London: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (2000). Discourse, Social Theory, and social research: The discourse of welfare reform. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4(2): 163-195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00110
Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power. Harlow, Eng: Longman.
Firth, J.R. (1957). Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951 (1957) London: Oxford University Press.
Halliday, M. A.K, & Matthiessen, C. M. (1999). Construing Experience through Meaning: A Language-based Approach to Cognition. (OLS). London and New York: Cassel.
Halliday, M. A., & Matthiessen, C. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.
Hasan, R. (1985). Linguistics, Language and Verbal Art. Melbourne: Deakin University Press. Reissued 1989, Oxford University Press.
Hasan, R. (1996). Ways of Saying, Ways of Meaning. Selected Papers of Ruqaiya Hasan. Edited by Carmel Cloran, David Butt and Geoff Williams. Cassell.
Horváth J. (2011) Critical discourse analysis of Obama's political discourse. Retrieved from http://www.pulib.sk/elpub2/FF/Ferencik2/pdf_doc/6.pdf
Kuo, S., & Nakamura, M. (2005). Translation or transformation? A case study of language and ideology in the Taiwanese press. Discourse & Society. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926505051172
Pelinka, A. (2007). Language as a political category: The viewpoint of political science. Journal of Language and Politics. 2007; 6(1):129-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.6.1.09pel
Pu, C. (2007). Discourse Analysis of President Bush's Speech at Tsinghua University, China. Intercultural Communication Studies, XVI(1): 205-216.
Richardson, J. E. (2007) Analysing Newspapers: An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-20968-8
Hunston, S. (2010). Corpus approaches to evaluation: Phraseology and evaluative language. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203841686
Hunston, S. (2004). Counting the uncountable: Problems of identifying evaluation in a text and in a corpus. Corpora and Discourse, 9, 157-188.
Tehseem, T. (2013) Transitivity in Pakistani Journalistic Discourse: A Linguistic Analysis of Ideology, ELF Annual Research Journal 15 (2013) 19-38.
Thompson, G. (2004) Introducing Functional Grammar (2nd edition) London: Arnold.
Thompson, G. (2008). From process to pattern: Methodological considerations in analysing transitivity in text. In Carys Jones & Eija Ventola (eds.) New Developments in the Study of Ideational Meaning. From Language to Multimodality, 17–33. London: Equinox.
van Dijk, T.A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society. 4(2): 249-283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006
van Dijk, T.A. (1997). What is political discourse analysis? Belgian Journal of Linguistics. 11(1): 11-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.11.03dij
Weiss, G., & Wodak, R. (2007). Critical discourse analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wodak, R. & Chilton, P. (2005). A new agenda in (critical) discourse analysis: theory, methodology and interdisciplinarity. Vol. 13. John Benjamins Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.13
Wodak, R. & Meyer, M. (2009). Methods for critical discourse analysis. Sage.
=========================
CSRC Publishing and JBSEE adhere to Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License. The authors submitting and publishing in JBSEE agree to the copyright policy under creative common license 4.0 (Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International). Under this license, the authors published in JBSEE retain the copyright including publishing rights of their scholarly work and agree to let others remix, tweak, and build upon their work non-commercially. All other authors using the content of SBSEE are required to cite author(s) and publisher in their work. CSRC Publishing and JBSEE follow an Open Access Policy for copyright and licensing.
